How do you write a systematic review protocol?

How do you write a systematic review protocol?

The protocol should include:

  1. Search question or objective.
  2. Inclusion/exclusion criteria (scope including types of studies, participants, interventions)
  3. Databases to be searched.
  4. Proposed search strategy.
  5. Methodology for data extraction and analysis.
  6. Declaration of interests.
  7. Time-frame.

What does a systematic review protocol include?

A systematic review protocol describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review. It should be prepared before a review is started and used as a guide to carry out the review.

How long should a systematic review protocol be?

Abstract. The Abstract should not exceed 350 words. Please minimize the use of abbreviations and do not cite references in the abstract.

How do you write a protocol?

Protocol summary: Give a concise overview of the project. Describe the purpose of the study, including problem to be investigated and hypothesis(es) to be tested, the population, and the methods that will be used. Avoid the use of acronyms. Include the expected benefit of the study.

What is Prospero protocol?

PROSPERO is an international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care. By promoting transparency in the process and enabling comparison of reported review findings with what was planned in the protocol PROSPERO also aims to minimise the risk of bias in systematic review.

Can Case reports be included in systematic reviews?

Yes inclusion of case series is not uncommon in systematic reviews of medical devices and surgical interventions. Not only randomized controlled trials, but also case series should be considered in systematic reviews of rapidly developing technologies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1253-1260.

Do you have to register a systematic review?

Systematic reviews should be registered at inception (i.e. at the protocol stage) to help avoid unplanned duplication and to enable comparison of reported review methods with what was planned in the protocol.

What is the review protocol?

The review protocol sets out the methods to be used in the review. Decisions about the review question, inclusion criteria, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, data synthesis and plans for dissemination should be addressed.

What is a written protocol?

A well-written protocol is the single-most important quality control tool in a clinical trial. A well-written protocol ensures that the study is designed to precisely test the hypotheses proposed and that the study will use a uniform methodology to strengthen the quality of the study’s outcome.

Do I have to register my systematic review?

Systematic reviews should be registered at inception (i.e. at the protocol stage) to help avoid unplanned duplication and to enable comparison of reported review methods with what was planned in the protocol. To register your review of learn more about PROSPERO, click here.

Is Prisma a protocol?

PRISMA-P is intended to guide the development of protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating therapeutic efficacy. Even for systematic reviews that are not evaluating efficacy, authors are encouraged to use PRISMA-P because of the lack of existing protocol guidance overall.

Why do you need a protocol for a systematic review?

The protocol serves as a roadmap for your review and specifies the objectives, methods, and outcomes of primary interest of the systematic review. Having a protocol promotes transparency and can be helpful for project management. Some journals require you to submit your protocol along with your manuscript.

Which is the best database for systematic review?

*** PROSPERO – International prospective register of systematic reviews. This is the primary database for registering systematic review protocols and searching for published protocols. Scoping reviews are not accepted.

What are the benefits of writing a protocol?

The benefits of a protocol Raises awareness of the review Promotes a systematic rather than ad hoc approach to the review Provides a public record of planned methods – reduces risk of bias

Which is an example of a systematic review?

Example outlining the details and documentation necessary for conducting a systematic review: Hersi, M., Traversy, G., Thombs, B. D., Beck, A., Skidmore, B., Groulx, S., … Stevens, A. (2019). Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review.

Share this post