Is it necessary to implement all methods of abstract class?
Yes, you must implement all abstract methods.
What is the use of non abstract method in abstract class?
An abstract class is a class that is declared abstract —it may or may not include abstract methods. Abstract classes cannot be instantiated, but they can be subclassed. When an abstract class is subclassed, the subclass usually provides implementations for all of the abstract methods in its parent class.
Should abstract methods be implemented?
Which method will force a subclass to implement it?
4 Answers. You can not force a subclass to override a method. You can only force it to implement a method by making it abstract.
Is it compulsory to override all methods of interface?
Yes, it is mandatory to implement all the methods in a class that implements an interface until and unless that class is declared as an abstract class. Declare the class as an abstract class, as a result, forces you to subclass the class (and implement the missing methods) before you can create any objects.
Can a constructor be abstract?
You can’t have an abstract constructor, as abstract means you need to provide the implementation for that at some point of time in your subclass. But you cannot override constructor. There will be no point in having an abstract constructor : Since the constructor needs to be of the same name as of class.
What are non abstract methods?
Conclusion: The biggest difference between abstract and non abstract method is that abstract methods can either be hidden or overridden, but non abstract methods can only be hidden. And that abstract methods don’t have an implementation, not even an empty pair of curly braces.
Can you use a non-abstract method in an interface in Java?
In Java, interface methods are public and abstract by default. So first option is bad practice. Point is that you can’t use non-abstract methods inside of interface, because they are abstract by default. But in abstract class you can use non-abstract or abstract methods. No, it can’t be done in Java 6 or 7.
Can you declare an abstract method in a non-abstract class?
Alternatively, you could keep your abstract Generic* -classes and add Null* -classes with abovementioned empty implementations, following the Null object pattern. You cannot declare abstract methods in a non-abstract class, final dot. That would simply defile the concept of abstract methods.
Can a C # compiler detect an abstract class?
C# compiler can detect and deny someone of using an abstract class directly because it uses the “abstract” keyword. C# also knows to force any child class to implement any abstract methods. How? because of the use of the “abstract” keyword. This is pretty simple to understand to anyone who has studied the internals of a programming language.
Why does C # not detect an abstract keyword?
So, why can’t C# detect an “abstract” keyword next to a method in a normal class and handle it at the COMPILE TIME. The reason is it takes “reworking” and the effort is not worth supporting the small demand. Specially in an industry that lacks people who think out of the boxes that big boys have given them.