Why do you think corporal punishment has persisted in some South African schools?
The South African education system historically has used corporal punishment to maintain discipline. Criticism of its effects led, in 1996, to the banning of this form of punishment. A neglected explanation is that corporal punishment persists because parents use it in the home and support its use in school.
When was corporal punishment banned in schools SA?
1997
Abolition of Corporal Punishment Act 33 of 1997 | South African Government.
Does South Africa use corporal punishment?
Corporal punishment has been prohibited in educational settings, the justice system (as a punishment and as a sentence) and alternate care in South Africa. However, it is still considered legal in the home by virtue of the common law provision for caregivers to “reasonably chastise” the children in their care.
What does the South African Schools Act say about corporal punishment?
Section 10(1) the South African Schools Act provides that no person may administer corporal punishment at a school against a learner. A person who contravenes this provision is guilty of a criminal offence, and, if convicted, can receive a sentence that can be imposed for assault.
What are the effects of corporal punishment on student learning?
Corporal punishment leads to adverse physical, psychological and educational outcomes – including increased aggressive and destructive behaviour, increased disruptive behaviour in the classroom, vandalism, poor school achievement, poor attention span, increased drop-out rate, school avoidance and school phobia, low …
Which act is against corporal punishment in schools?
Also, the National Education Policy Act (1996) states that no person “shall administer corporal punishment or subject a student to psychological or physical abuse at any educational institution”. WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE A VICTIM OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT?
Is corporal punishment in schools effective?
There is general consensus that corporal punishment is effective in getting children to comply immediately while at the same time there is caution from child abuse researchers that corporal punishment by its nature can escalate into physical maltreatment,” Gershoff writes.
What is the difference between corporal punishment and abuse?
At least one state, Ohio, appears to provide parents with statutory authority to cause a child more harm in disciplinary contexts than in nondisciplinary contexts; its corporal-punishment exception provides that physical discipline that is “excessive under the circumstances and creates a substantial risk of serious …
When was corporal punishment introduced in South Africa?
In 1996, the legislature adopted the South African Schools Act No. 84 of 1996 (herein after called the Schools Act). The Schools Act brought along with it Section 10 [2] thereof which reads as follows:
What does the Schools Act say about corporal punishment?
The Schools Act brought along with it Section 10 thereof which reads as follows: Prohibition of corporal punishment: (1) No person may administer corporal punishment at a school to a learner. 10 (2) Any person who contravenes subsection (l) is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a sentence which could be imposed for assault.
Why are SGBS not involved in corporal punishment?
Both were in line with consensual dem ocratic ideas about school governance. The new approach involve d a different violence, negotiation and the deve lopment of school comm unities. the democratic transform ation of schools. Parents constitutionally com- prise the majority of SG B members. SGBs are not involved in the
What is a positive discipline in South Africa?
Positive discipline A form of discipline that is not punitive, but rather promotes punishment that facilitates constructive learning. 334 Basic Education Rights Handbook Education Rights in South Africa Chapter 19: Corporal punishmentBasic Education Rights Handbook Education Rights in South Africa Chapter 19: Corporal punishment 335